Skip to main content

Subscribe to thawilsonMAG for .25 cents

WilsonBlock1000 Radio

OPINION: What Do You Mean 'My Body My Choice'?


Now, I'm not insinuating that a woman shouldn't be able to protect herself and her own best interests. However, there are nuances to this "my body my choice" concept that I feel calls for a challenge. Basically, my question is what does 'your body your choice' have to do with the fact that it took two to make the child? If a Man gives his seed to a woman, what right does a woman have to run off with HIS, or THEIR child once it is born. You see, American women have embraced the protections afforded to them by government; and they reap these benefits even if it is at the expense of other citizens whether male or female, white or black. Dr. Umar Johnson said in a recent interview that governments deliberately put women on a pedestal because they are not military threats. And whether thats true or not, it makes sense to me.

With all due respect to the female, the societal culture in the United States about women always being right and Men having to suffer the loss of control over their households just to keep a happy marriage is just downright wrong. I feel like a real woman would forfeit these provisions in exchange of standing by her family. But, these days, women take full advantage of others being robbed of civility so that they can exercise extra-curricular control that doesn't nurture happy homes. The United States government is actively influencing American society to be perverted. They are essentially robbing us of a bright future. 

Let me make this clear: abortion is wrong. If we're going to make exemptions for rape cases, then so be it. But, what we're not going to do is normalize a culture of perversion and willful murder. When we discuss these issues, the premise seems to always be based on why we should have rights to do the wrong things whilst never considering preventative measures. For example, there are women out there who feel strongly about their so-called right to abort their baby. But, they never consider, oh I don't know, not having sex maybe. Abstaining. Abstinence is a powerful tool. It can be applied to various facets of life that will ensure a desired outcome. There are things we do to make sure things happen, or never happen. The 'my body my choice' stance implies that the woman has the sole discretion over the baby's life...without consequence. And these positions have contributed to attacks on the institution of marriage. Men are starting to feel like marriage just isn't worth it for them while the women who actually do want to get married still carry around expectations inherited from their parents. 

Yes, ultimately, a woman will make the ultimate decision regarding her body. But, to just flat out insist that the father of the child does not and/or should not have a say in the matter is pure evil. How shallow does a person have to be to take such a position and not be ashamed? These are cowardly natures that are detrimental to a healthy society. And to be clear, I'm not sitting here saying Men should be able to overrule a woman's ultimate decision regarding her body. But, what I am saying is that the Man who helped make that baby should absolutely have a say-so in the matter. And for women to run behind the government to extort others involved is just savage. When a women uses the government to extort her Man, it establishes a war between male and female. 

You see, 'my body my choice' is just a front for women to steal Men's babies so they can profit off of their lives thru the government, who has every reason to want to indoctrinate your children. A millennial Man like myself then begins to wonder if I'd even be able to protect my family at all. I mean, after all, whether you agree or not, it doesn't matter where you plant an apple seed in the world. It will produce apples. The soil cultivates the seed but the seed is still an apple seed. In the same way, when a Man gets a woman pregnant, it's essentially the Man's seed. But, I don't say it's tha Man's seed just for him to escape with the child, either. Of course, the child is a gift from God for both of you. But, to insist there isn't nor should there be a proper order to things is inconclusive, meaning you have come to conclusions on things you know you don't fully understand.

Women who are firmly planted on the ideals of pro-abortion should consider giving themselves over to further study. It is important that, amidst these differences, all things are considered. When I take an open stance against abortion, it's because I've considered the arguments of my detractors. I've given conscious thought to the position of my opponent so that our discourse might benefit of us both. It's a touchy subject, for sure. But, it's a moral issue that can be remedied with a little love and integrity. Then again, you have people out there who are in an honest disposition whereas others are straightforward sinister about their intentions. 

It almost seems as though women, in their attempt to not be bullied, in turn bullies Men into taking what rightfully belongs to them just as much as the mother. Women have grown to forget about the protective instincts Men have towards their family. Imagine a Lioness taking the cubs of a alpha male lion and running off with them. I don't think the Lion is going to appreciate that very much, especially knowing the lioness will have an inclination to find another mate. And that leads me to my final point concerning abortion. Women plot in the dark to rebel against their man and use the government to strip him of his kids so that she can collect a welfare check while dating other strange Men. It happens all the time. Do you understand how threatening it is for a Father deal with another strange Man being around his children? Why should this be the case just because the woman decided not to be loyal? Who installed the idea in her mind that she doesn't have to be loyal? That she could just up and take the Man for everything he has any time she's ready to quit. And that's why I abhor the thought of a United States marriage license. Because the government is going to step in with guns and paperwork to interfere in the affairs of grown Men. And that is a recipe for absolute disaster. 

The 'My Body My Choice' movement has stifled relationships in America and around the Eurocentric world. It's like, because we all know the woman is the weaker vessel compared to Men, we give in to their rebellion and let them win. But, to just let them wins means that no one wins. The kids don't get to live with both parents, the Man is out of a relationship and a family, and the women, whether she likes it or not, endures bitterness for the rest of her life. This movement is a disrespectful towards Men and an insult to the institution of marriage. I mean, who told these women they have a right to run off with a Man's child. Most of the time, it's not because of anything the Man did wrong. It's usually because the influences society plants in the minds of it's citizens gives these women the idea that they don't have to be loyal because they can fall back and rely on the government for assistance. Women have been given absolutely too much credit, credit they simply don't deserve. Credit that throws others under the bus. And they gladly accept it with a smile on their face, knowing they're not right. 

What makes these women strongly believe that they can run off with what a Man gave them? What it took two people to create, one gets to make sole decisions for? Imagine investing in a business with a partner and you both put in the same amount only for one of the partners to make a decision that negatively affects the other partner's ability to decide. Imagine buying a bicycle at the department store for $250 and they keep your change after you tendered $300. Imagine buying a microwave but a toaster came in the box. All these scenarios would frustrate any human. The common denominator is that none of them make sense. And women thinking they have a right to take what two people helped create and withhold it from the other party at their own expense is just an outright evil. It's a spirit that comes straight out of hell. And we rebuke these evil spirits in the mighty name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 

May God be with us all.

Comments

  1. I agree. It takes two to make a child and the woman should not be allowed to abort a child just because it is growing inside of her. Abortion is wrong. On the other hand, two people that are in a committed marriage are not trying to abort anything. They understand that one of the purposes of them getting married is to bring into this world, healthy, loving, and God fearing individuals. Abortion is not an option. Abortion is mainly the thought of people who are not in a committed marriage relationship, or having sex outside of marriage.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

WilsonBlock1000 Weekly Charts

How a Mentally Ill Defendant Used AI to Expose a Statewide Scandal

In a stunning and surreal twist that blends the raw tenacity of local grassroots culture with cutting-edge artificial intelligence, a mentally ill indigent defendant born and raised in Los Angeles County’s foster care system has ignited a firestorm that now threatens to engulf the very machinery of California’s justice system. Armed with nothing but a smartphone, persistence, and ChatGPT, this underdog has methodically exposed what may become one of the most consequential constitutional crises in California history. And in the center of it all? Mistah Wilson — founder of *ThaWilsonBlock*, a hyper-local media platform built to preserve community voice, uplift independent artists, and empower those often excluded from mainstream narratives. Michael Taylor —whose life began under state custody—has spent decades navigating the shadows of institutions: group homes, courtrooms, and broken social contracts. Branded early with mental health diagnoses and shuffled from p...

Gavin Newsom Implicated in RICO Conspiracy to Cover-Up Judicial Fraud | Publicly Filed Confidential Medical Records of Mentally Ill Defendant

How a Sealed Court Order, a Fraudulent Assessment, and a Governor-Appointed Judge Orchestrated a Criminal Cover-Up in Plain View In a state supposedly championing progressive justice reform, the State of California has committed one of the most disturbing abuses of power in recent history — a textbook case of **government-sponsored fraud**, **constitutional sabotage**, and **racketeering under color of law**. What began as a routine criminal case devolved into a multi-year, multi-agency conspiracy — implicating judges, public defenders, state evaluators, and ultimately, **Governor Gavin Newsom** himself — in a concerted effort to falsify judicial proceedings, incarcerate a legally competent defendant, and obstruct exculpatory evidence. This is the story of how a sealed diversion order was transformed — illegally — into a **fraudulent competency proceeding**, weaponized against a defendant who refused to surrender his rights. ### **The Case Begins: From Charges t...

How A Defendant Won The Case, on Substance, in People v. Michael Taylor (XNEGA1111-32)

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATION "Fraud Upon the Court: How the People v. Michael Taylor Case Exposes a Judicial System in Crisis" By ThaWilsonBlock Magazine Investigative Team Pasadena, CA – In a quiet courtroom at the Pasadena branch of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, a case that began as a routine criminal prosecution has now erupted into a far-reaching constitutional crisis. New evidence and court documents obtained by ThaWilsonBlock Magazine suggest that in People v. Michael Taylor (Case No. XNEGA111132), the court may be actively concealing violations of its own judicial orders—raising red flags about judicial integrity, attorney collusion, and systemic abuse of mental health evaluations to silence defendants. At the center of the storm is Michael Taylor, a pro se defendant who has meticulously documented what he says is a fraud upon the court—an unconstitutional act that nullifies all subsequent proceedings. His evidence points to a judicial system leveraging...

There’s Aaliyah. There’s Ciara. And Then There’s Maya Huyana 💥

“There’s Aaliyah. There’s Ciara. Then There’s Maya Huyana.” That’s the kind of headline the Los Angeles music scene deserves—because in every quiet verse and soulful refrain, Maya Huyana has proven she’s a force of nature. Known also by her creative moniker YaH‑Ra, (though I personally prefer her as  Maya Huyana), she’s carved out a niche all her own: a unique blend of R&B, hip‑hop, soul, and world music that has echoed across Southern California and beyond. 🎶 A Legacy Etched in Releases From her early days, Maya Huyana has been dedicated to evolving her craft. Her REBiRTH EP , released on September 27, 2017, introduced listeners to raw lyricism and rich production—complete with beats by GoldDigga, mixing/mastering by Viva Mescal—and even scratching by DJ Drastik . This project signaled the emergence of an artist willing to bare her soul. Next came the SEA‑FOAM EP , dropping June 26, 2019. Produced by Ethan Hill, it featured standout tracks like “ HiTTA ” and “ BL...

Why People Choose Religion Over Reality

🔍 Faith vs. Facts: Why Many People Choose Religion Outside of Objective Reality—and Why That Can Be a Fundamental Error In a world filled with scientific discovery, global communication, and access to virtually unlimited information, one would think humanity would be guided more than ever by objective reality. But still, billions of people cling—sometimes desperately—to religions that contradict evidence, defy logic, or ignore the observable world. Why? The reasons are complex, deeply human, and often emotional. But when these reasons replace reason itself, it can lead to what we call a fundamental error—the misalignment of belief systems with reality in a way that limits personal growth, distorts truth, and creates social harm. Let’s be honest. Religion offers what reality often doesn’t: People turn to religion for comfort in a world that feels chaotic, cruel, or unpredictable. The idea of a divine plan, eternal life, or cosmic justice can make suffering seem meaningful—e...

Costco Plans to Launch Its First Stand-Alone Gas Station in California — and It's Set to Be the Biggest Yet

📍 Mission Viejo, CA In a bold move that bucks a couple of industry trends, Costco is preparing to open its first-ever stand-alone gas station in California — and it’s shaping up to be the warehouse giant’s largest fuel site to date. Set to be built at 25732 El Paseo in the Mission Viejo Freeway Center, right off the I-5, the upcoming station will sit alongside heavy-hitter retailers like Krispy Kreme, Best Buy, and Petco — making it a potentially high-traffic hub for South OC commuters. According to reporting by the Orange County Register, city officials greenlit the project back in March. The new gas station will take over the site of a closed Bed Bath & Beyond, with demolition, grading, and permits currently in motion. If all goes to plan, construction is expected to begin this fall, with a Spring 2026 grand opening on the calendar. While many gas stations pair their fuel pumps with a convenience store — often where the bulk of profits are made — this stand-alone mod...

The "Due Process" Conundrum for Undocumented Persons

In the United States, the phrase "due process" has a certain sanctity—it's enshrined in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, promising that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without fair procedures. It's a shield designed to protect individuals from arbitrary actions by the government. But how does this constitutional principle apply to those who find themselves on U.S. soil without the necessary papers to prove their lawful entry? Let’s dig into this controversial issue, the process of due process for the undocumented, and the constitutional implications of how this plays out. The "Due Process" Conundrum for the Undocumented At first glance, it may seem like the concept of due process wouldn't apply to people who are on U.S. soil without permission. After all, the very nature of being undocumented suggests that one has bypassed the legal requirements for entry or remained beyond their lawful v...

The Timeless Legacy of the Chevy El Camino

The Timeless Legacy of the Chevy El Camino The Unlikely Legend – A Car That Became a Culture There are muscle cars. There are trucks. And then there’s the Chevy El Camino — the unforgettable, genre-defying machine that turned heads and rewrote the rulebook. Part car, part pickup, part outlaw, the El Camino wasn’t just transportation — it was an attitude on wheels. In a world where vehicles fit neatly into categories, the El Camino crashed the party with something no one saw coming: a car that hauled lumber during the day and cruised the boulevard at night. 🛠 A Bold Beginning: The 1959 Debut The El Camino first hit American streets in 1959, Chevy’s response to the Ford Ranchero, a coupe utility vehicle that had already tested the market. But Chevrolet wasn’t content to just copy and paste — they designed the El Camino with a lower stance, sleeker lines, and a touch of muscle-car sex appeal. It was a pickup, yes — but it had soul. And chrome. Lots of chrome. Though the initi...

Mpox Remains Public Health Emergency of International Concern - WHO

Katson Maliro/WHO Scaling up response to curb growing mpox outbreak in African region. 10 June 2025 Premium Times (Abuja) By Mariam Ileyemi PREMIUM TIMES review of WHO global mpox trends shows that the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) remains the epicentre, consistently reporting between 200 and 600 new weekly cases. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has maintained that Mpox, formerly known as monkeypox, continues to constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). WHO Director-General, Tedros Ghebreyesus, made this declaration following the fourth meeting of the International Health Regulations (IHR) Emergency Committee held on 5 June, where global health experts reviewed the situation and advised to uphold the emergency status. In a statement, Mr Ghebreyesus said that although some countries have made progress in responding to the outbreak, the overall situation remains concerning. He noted that the decision was influenced by the continuous in...

Bell MT California Plain Yellow & Burgundy by Mistah Wilson Pullover Sweatshirt

Bell MT California Plain Yellow & Burgundy by Mistah Wilson Pullover Sweatshirt SHOP NOW Heavyweight 8.25 oz. (~280 gsm) cotton-rich fleece Solid colors are 80% cotton, 20% polyester. Heather Grey is 70% cotton, 30% polyester. Charcoal Heather is 60% cotton, 40% polyester Crew neck sweatshirt with ribbed cuffs, neckband and hem Note: If you like your sweatshirts baggy and oversized go 2 sizes up Washing instructions: Hand or machine wash cold. Do not dry clean, bleach, tumble dry or iron on the print The third party printer of this product is evaluated according to International Labor Organization standards The printer of this product sources blanks from manufacturers committed to improving cotton farming practices with the Better Cotton Initiative Since every item is made just for you by your local third-party fulfiller, there may be slight variances in the product received

Local Music Scenes