DEFENDANT #7: MERY ALABERKYAN (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

Role in People v. Michael Taylor (XNEGA111132)

Judicial assistant in Judge Ronald Owen Kaye’s courtroom during a key jurisdictional transfer from Pasadena to Hollywood. On February 28, 2024, Mery Alaberkyan filed Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo’s psychiatric assessment into the Hollywood courthouse record—despite the evaluation being formally addressed to Judge Suzette Clover in Pasadena and used to suspend proceedings there. Her act cemented the transfer of a procedurally defective document across venue lines, effectively laundering the assessment into a new record.

Summary of Involvement

Mery Alaberkyan’s role, while clerical in form, was critical in substance. She acted as the administrative channel through which a psychiatric evaluation—produced under questionable authority in Pasadena—was publicly filed and entered into the record in the Hollywood courthouse under Judge Kaye.

This maneuver occurred after the proceedings had shifted jurisdictions, and notably, the minute order for February 28, 2024, does not list Alaberkyan as the judicial assistant of record on that day. Yet her signature and file stamp appear on the docketed document, suggesting either procedural irregularity, unauthorized clerical action, or coordination not reflected on the record.

Even more concerning is the fact that Dr. D’Ingillo’s assessment was addressed solely to Judge Suzette Clover in Pasadena, raising serious doubts about its legitimacy as a judicial instrument in Hollywood. By filing it in the new courthouse, Alaberkyan inadvertently—or perhaps deliberately—gave procedural life to a document that should have expired with its issuing court.

Adding to the intrigue is Alaberkyan’s educational connection to Danielle Daroca-Bell, with both reportedly alumni of Southwestern Law School, calling into question the possibility of professional collusion or shared institutional loyalty.

Why She Is Defendant #7 in the Dossier

• Filed a jurisdictionally defective psychiatric report, giving legal effect to an evaluation with no standing in the new court.
• Acted outside the assigned record for the day, raising questions about document manipulation or ghost-filing.
• Played a pivotal role in laundering a sealed psychiatric assessment into public proceedings post-transfer.
• Her academic ties to Daroca-Bell cast a shadow over whether internal networks facilitated the continuity of unconstitutional procedures.

> “Though not robed, Mery Alaberkyan handled the pen that moved sealed psychiatry across courthouses, validating with a stamp what due process never authorized. The Dossier names her not for the gown she lacked, but for the chain of custody she corrupted.”