WilsonBlock1000 Radio

Featured News

Why It Appears That Women Are Taking Over Everything

Who Defined “Jewish”? The Deeper Battle Over Identity and Divine Authority By: Michael Taylor | ThaWilsonBlock Magazine In today’s world of rewritten truths and rebranded identities, few topics are more misunderstood—or more manipulated—than the question: Who is a Jew? For centuries, institutions, cultures, and religious authorities have claimed the right to define Jewishness. But beneath the noise of tradition and politics lies a deeper issue—a spiritual one. Because the question isn't just how “Jewish” is defined. The real question is: Who or what has the authority to define it in the first place? --- The Origin of the Covenant When we go back to the beginning, the answer is simple and undeniable. The Most High—YHWH—established a covenant with Abraham, reaffirmed it through Isaac, and fulfilled it through Jacob, who was renamed Israel. The covenant was not based on culture or customs. It was based on divine election and lineage. > “I will establish my covenant betw...

DEFENDANT #6: SHARON LEONETTE RANSOM #230371 (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

 

Role in People v. Michael Taylor (XNEGA111132)
As prosecuting attorney during key competency proceedings, Sharon Ransom relied upon a disputed psychiatric assessment by Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo to petition the court for defendant Michael Bernard Taylor Jr.’s forced commitment to Metropolitan State Hospital and administration of involuntary psychotropic medication. She has since ascended to the bench as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys (Dept. H).


Summary of Involvement
While serving as Deputy District Attorney, Sharon Ransom played a central prosecutorial role in engineering the psychiatric narrative that would be used to deprive Michael Taylor of his liberty, autonomy, and bodily integrity. She actively presented and adopted Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo’s competency evaluation as judicial gospel—despite the fact that the evaluation itself was initiated under the shadow of a sealed, unproduced order never served upon the defense.

Ransom petitioned the court not just for a 1370 commitment, but also for authorization to administer involuntary psychiatric medication, asserting that Mr. Taylor lacked capacity and posed a risk to himself and others—a position built on procedurally defective foundations.

At no point did Ransom acknowledge or challenge the fact that the evaluation she leaned upon lacked judicial transparency. Her office refused to disclose the origin or legal basis of the sealed order, reinforcing a framework of procedural darkness. She stood as the prosecutorial sword behind the State's push for incarceration-by-diagnosis, not conviction.

Since then, Sharon Ransom has been elected to the bench herself, now presiding as a Superior Court Judge in Van Nuys Court, Department H, raising larger concerns about how such prosecutorial tactics are rewarded within the very system they help to compromise.


Why She Is Defendant #6 in the Dossier:
  • Knowingly relied on a fraudulent or undisclosed court order to commit a defendant to psychiatric incarceration.
  • Pushed for forced medication of a pretrial defendant without clear statutory authority.
  • Participated in the collusion between court, psychiatry, and prosecution that the Dossier seeks to expose.
  • Her promotion to the bench signifies institutional reward for prosecutorial conduct that disregards constitutional protections.
> “In the courtroom of Judge Kaye, Sharon Ransom was the spearpoint of a psychiatric prosecution masquerading as legal process. Today, she wears robes—but the record bears witness to her role in the pretrial silencing of a defendant by chemical decree.”

Comments

Mistah Wilson's Podcast

Pasadena Music Scene

Seattle Music Scene

Los Angeles Music Scene

Political Narratives

Religious Narratives

Hip Hop Narratives

Sports Narratives

Meet Tha Artist (Full Stories)

Street Sign Photography