DEFENDANT #40: PATRICIA GUERRERO #190834 (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

Role in People v. Michael Bernard Taylor (XNEGA111132-01)
Patricia Guerrero is named Defendant #40 in The Vernon Patterson Dossier for her institutional role as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court and statutory head of the State Bar of California’s regulatory structure. Through this dual authority, she is legally and ethically responsible for supervising attorney discipline, protecting the public, and ensuring the judicial branch operates in conformity with constitutional principles.

Despite these obligations, the California Supreme Court under Chief Justice Guerrero has:

• Failed to act upon repeated, substantiated implication notices from Defendant Michael Taylor detailing fraud upon the court, systemic prosecutorial misconduct, and violations of due process tied to unauthorized psychiatric proceedings;
• Allowed the State Bar of California—its official regulatory arm—to dismiss formal misconduct complaints (including Exhibits C-1 to C-8) without investigation, notice, or redress;
• Overseen a system where sealed court orders are ignored, mental health law is weaponized, and attorney silence is tacitly rewarded.

This constitutes constructive ratification of ongoing violations and renders her personally implicated under Monell liability theory, where high-ranking officials enable systemic harm through deliberate indifference to known constitutional deprivations.


Grounds for Implication

1. Statutory and Supervisory Authority
As Chief Justice, Guerrero chairs or oversees:

• The Judicial Council of California, which sets policy for the state judiciary;
• The Commission on Judicial Appointments, which reviews and confirms judges (including Ronald Kaye);
• The California Supreme Court, which has ultimate disciplinary authority over all licensed attorneys;
• The California State Bar, a constitutional arm of the court per Cal. Const. art. VI, § 9.

This means she has non-delegable supervisory responsibility over both the adjudicators (judges) and prosecutors (attorneys) implicated in the misconduct described in Taylor’s complaints.


2. Monell Liability for Policy-Level Failure
Per Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), a government official can be held liable when:

> “The execution of a policy or custom... inflicts the injury.”

Chief Justice Guerrero has presided over:

• A custom of non-enforcement where attorney misconduct is dismissed by the State Bar without inquiry;
• A pattern of non-responsiveness to public complaints involving sealed orders, fraudulent filings, and misrepresentations to courts;
• An institutional structure that denies meaningful access to redress by shielding attorneys and judges from independent scrutiny.

In People v. Michael Taylor, the failure of the regulatory system to stop, reverse, or even acknowledge:

• The use of a PC § 730 competency report without a court order,
• The failure to protect Taylor’s religious confidentiality rights,
• The breach of California’s diversion statute (PC § 1001.36),
• The concealment of records in sealed Marsden proceedings,

—all occurred under the Court’s jurisdiction, and Guerrero’s leadership, making her liable as a policymaker with notice of institutional failure.


3. Cumulative Constitutional Harm Allowed on Her Watch

Taylor’s claims span:

• Fourteenth Amendment Due Process violations through arbitrary detention;
• Sixth Amendment violations through ineffective assistance of counsel and silenced objections;
• Equal Protection violations due to selective enforcement of rights;
• Voting Rights Act and NVRA violations due to loss of electoral participation during wrongful hospitalization.

Each of these violations occurred within California’s judicial system—a system the California Supreme Court oversees. Chief Justice Guerrero’s failure to intervene, correct, or even respond, especially given that she had constructive notice via public complaints and institutional reporting chains, elevates her liability beyond mere neglect into deliberate indifference.

> 🧨 “What the Constitution prohibits, the Chief Justice permitted—by silence, by structure, and by standing behind a broken regulatory machine.”

Implication Summary
Patricia Guerrero, as California’s Chief Justice, stands at the summit of a statewide system that rubber-stamps legal abuse against indigent defendants, shields attorneys from discipline, and offers no relief for pro se litigants reporting structural fraud. Her passive endorsement of the State Bar’s inaction, when paired with judicial misconduct by judges she administratively oversees, satisfies the elements of Monell liability for supervisory failure.

Her name belongs in The Vernon Patterson Dossier not for what she did—but for what she refused to do, when justice demanded it.

CIVIL INDICTMENTS

DEFENDANT #1: VERNON LLOYD PATTERSON #165016
DEFENDANT #2: DANIELLE MARIE DAROCA-BELL #265746
DEFENDANT #3: SUZETTE LOUISE CLOVER #89066
DEFENDANT #4: DR. PIETRO D'INGILLO #18141
DEFENDANT #5: RONALD OWEN KAYE #145051
DEFENDANT #6: SHARON LEONETTE RANSOM #230371
DEFENDANT #7: MERY ALABERKYAN
DEFENDANT #8: DR. PHANI MADHAV TUMU #A89555
DEFENDANT #9: MICHAEL HERMAN SALMAGGI #201301
DEFENDANT #10: HANNAH MANDEL 333020
DEFENDANT #11: MICHAEL DOUGLAS CARTER #152749
DEFENDANT #12: DAVID W. SLAYTON
DEFENDANT #13: KATHRYN ANN BARGER-LEIBRICH
DEFENDANT #14: RICARDO DANIEL GARCIA #178111
DEFENDANT #15: STEPHANIE CLENDENIN
DEFENDANT #16: DR. MICHAEL BARSOM
DEFENDANT #17: DR. KORY KNAPKE #A49908
DEFENDANT #18: SERGIO TAPIA 2 #185836
DEFENDANT #19: ASHFAQ GANI CHOWDHURY #243763
DEFENDANT #20: GEORGE GASCÓN #182345
DEFENDANT #21: RON ANDRES BONTA #202668
DEFENDANT #22: MARK RICHARD HARVEY #155618
DEFENDANT #23: GRANT PARKS
DEFENDANT #24: GAVIN CHRISTOPHER NEWSOM
DEFENDANT #25: RONALD DION DESANTIS #15976
DEFENDANT #26: SYDNEY KAMLAGER-DOVE
DEFENDANT #27: ERIKA ANZOÁTEGUI #187012
DEFENDANT #28: MARILYN E. BEDNARSKI #105322
DEFENDANT #29: BARRET STEPHEN LITT #45527
DEFENDANT #30: DAVID SEAN MCLANE #124952
DEFENDANT #31: KEVIN JAY LAHUE #237556
DEFENDANT #32: LINDSAY BROOKE BATTLES #262862
DEFENDANT #33: LAURA FRANCES DONALDSON #307638
DEFENDANT #34: RODRIGO ISMAEL PADILLA HERNANDEZ #339523
DEFENDANT #35: JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR.
DEFENDANT #36: DONALD JOHN TRUMP
DEFENDANT #37: ERIKA KIRSTEN LEIGHTON DOHERTY #283026
DEFENDANT #38: NATHAN JOSEPH HOCHMAN #139137
DEFENDANT #39: FRANCES ROTHSCHILD #39602
DEFENDANT #40: PATRICIA GUERRERO #190834

The Vernon Patterson Dossier

Exhibit A-1 (4/8/25): [EMAIL] Vernon Patterson Admits No Court Order for PC 730 Competency Assessment
Exhibit A-2 (5/8/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Dismisses Due Process While Presuming Client's Guilt
Exhibit A-3 (5/12/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Declares Unlawful State Hospital Commitment a “Non-Issue”
Exhibit A-4 (5/13/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Denies Relevance of Missing Court Order While Scheduling New Competency Exam
Exhibit A-5 (5/14/25): [COURT ORDER] Vernon Patterson Materializes Threat to Re-Evaluate Defendant Without Correcting Prior Fraud
Exhibit A-6 (5/15/25): [SMS] Defendant Rejects Unlawful Psychiatric Evaluation; Patterson Refuses to Answer Jurisdictional Challenge
Exhibit A-7 (5/23/25): [SMS] Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence
Exhibit A-8 (5/28/25): [SMS] Defendant Demands Consent Waiver and Dismantles Cover-Up
Exhibit A-9 (6/3/25): [EMAIL] Vernon Patterson’s Constructive Abandonment and Weaponized Incompetency Allegations
Exhibit A-10 (6/23/25): [SMS] Vernon Patterson Folds! Withdraws Representation Without Due Process

Exhibit B-1 (10/2/23) [SMS] Judge Suzette Clover Appoints Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo As Confidential Expert for Mental Health Diversion (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
EXHIBIT B-2 (2/14/24) [EVALUATION] Unauthorized Competency Report Submitted in Violation of Court Order and Statutory Privileges (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
EXHIBIT B-3 (2/14/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Unauthorized Invocation of PC §1368 and Retroactive Justification of Prior Evaluation (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-4 (2/28/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Appearance Waived, New Judge Assigned, Competency Hearing Continued W/O Jurisdictional Clarity (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-5 (5/1/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Defendant Withholds Consent Pending Constitutional Challenge — Evaluation Aborted (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-6 (6/21/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Defendant Refuses Evaluation Until Prior Due Process Violation Is Cured — No Opinion Rendered (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-7 (8/30/24) [EVALUATION REPORT] Involuntary Medication Order Recommended Solely on Records and Prior Contested Evaluation (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-8 (8/30/24) [MINUTE ORDER] Judicial Authorization of Forced Medication, Voter Disqualification, and Broad HIPAA Disclosure Without Procedural Redress (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit B-9 (5/14/24) [COURT ORDER] Court Authorizes Confidential Psychiatric Evaluation at Defense Request Following Accusations of Constructive Abandonment and Due Process Violations (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

Exhibit C-1 (4.28.24) [COMPLAINT] Material Falsehoods & Constructive Ratification by The California State Bar (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-2 (3/20/24) CJP Complaint on Judge Clover (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-3 (3/18/25) [EMAIL] DSH Engages In Constructive Ratification of Fraud by Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-4 (5/15/25) [EMAIL] Sydney Kamlager-Dove Engages In Constructive Abandonment of Constituent Amidst Judicial Fraud (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-5 (4/8/24) [EMAIL] The Cochran Firm Declines Representation; Mandatory Reporting Duties Still Implied (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-6 (5/18/25) [EMAIL] ACLU of Southern California – Declination, Constructive Notice, and Failure of Mandated Reporting Duties (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-7 (6/10/25) [EMAIL] Judicial Acknowledgment of Fraud Upon The Court By 2nd Appellate District Court of California (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-8 (6/15/25) [EMAIL] Trump's DOJ Endorses Constructive Judicial Misconduct That Originated Under Biden (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-9 (6/22/25) [EMAIL] Congresswoman Judy Chu Receives Formal Complaint of Fraud Upon The Court After DOJ Closed Complaint (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Exhibit C-10 (7/1/25) [LAWSUIT] California Attorney General Rob Bonta Violates Equal Protection of Defendant Michael Taylor (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

Suspects

Suspect #1: BRANDON STALLINGS #263244
Suspect #2: TANI GORRE CANTIL-SAKAUYE #114470
Suspect #3: BEATRIZ TAPIA
Suspect #4: ANDREW SAGAN
Suspect #5: CONSUELO MARIA CALLAHAN #65370
Suspect #6: DARBY DICKERSON
Suspect #7: CHARLES F. ROBINSON
Suspect #8: MARK T. HARRIS #111213
Suspect #9: PAMELA JO BONDI #886440
Suspect #10: ANAHITA SEDAGHATFAR #217289