DEFENDANT #1: VERNON LLOYD PATTERSON #165016 (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)

 

Role in People v. Michael Taylor (XNEGA111132)

Appointed bar panel defense attorney for Michael Bernard Taylor, Jr., under the Los Angeles County Superior Court system. Allegedly acted as an agent of concealment and procedural sabotage by facilitating a competency proceeding in violation of a sealed court order, while suppressing the defendant’s on-record objections. His actions — and inactions — are central to the exposure of the court’s concealed chain of command.

Summary of Involvement
Vernon Lloyd Patterson is not simply a court-appointed lawyer in People v. Michael Taylor — he is the central human gateway through which systemic fraud was delivered onto the record. As bar number #165016, Patterson was sworn to defend Taylor’s constitutional rights. Instead, he became the silent courier of unlawful psychiatric proceedings, shielding the court’s violations with strategic indifference, misleading explanations, and deceptive communication.

The Dossier bearing his name was not titled lightly. It reflects the grave weight of what Patterson’s presence revealed — that he operated less as counsel and more as a courier for higher judicial command. He transmitted fraudulent paperwork, misrepresented sealed orders, gaslit his own client into silence, and attempted to normalize due process violations under the guise of legal procedure.

At key stages, Patterson admitted in writing that the sealed court order was never seen. Yet, he proceeded to enforce the evaluation, knowing its legal foundation was void. He told Taylor to “let [him] know when you want to surrender,” and offered to explain to the court “why [Taylor] feels it is necessary to stop proceedings.” These statements reflect not representation, but facilitated surrender — positioning his own client as mentally defective while insulating the court from exposure.

Even worse, Patterson persisted after Judge Carter had already acknowledged that no order was ever signed. Rather than defend Taylor, he functioned as the Court’s mouthpiece, keeping up the illusion of due process while trampling over the defendant’s right to confront, object, and access court records.

Why He Is the #1 Suspect — and Namesake of the Dossier:

• He crossed the line from ineffective assistance to active procedural betrayal.
• He upheld a false record, even when directly shown the underlying fraud.
• He attempted to suppress the defendant’s objections by framing them as evidence of mental illness.
• He became the living proof that the public defense system is subordinate to secret judicial interests.

The Dossier is named after Patterson not merely because of what he did, but because his very presence reveals what the system is built to hide. His role exposes the institutional conspiracy of silence between court-appointed defenders, judges, and mental health contractors. He is the human breach in the firewall.

> “To name the Dossier after Patterson is not to accuse him alone — it is to mark the exact fault line where legal defense ends and state control begins.”