Here’s a compelling, insightful, and legally grounded article for Thawilsonblock Magazine, written in a clear, public-facing style:
---
When Justice Breaks Down: The Case of Roy Lee Humphrey — A Teen Sentenced as an Adult Without Due Process
By Thawilsonblock Magazine Staff
Imagine being 17 years old — still legally a child — and suddenly facing the adult criminal system without the protections the law promises to every minor. This is not a hypothetical. It is the shocking reality of what happened to Roy Lee Humphrey, who was arrested in Sacramento County in 2002, prosecuted as an adult, and sentenced without any of the critical safeguards California law requires for juveniles.
---
The Law: Juvenile Courts Have Exclusive Power — With Strict Rules
Under California’s Welfare & Institutions Code (WIC) § 603, the juvenile court has exclusive initial jurisdiction over minors. This means before a minor can ever be treated as an adult by the criminal courts, the juvenile court must follow very strict rules and timelines:
1. WIC § 631: A petition must be filed within 48 hours of taking a minor into custody.
2. WIC § 632: A detention hearing must occur within 48-72 hours.
3. WIC § 657: A jurisdictional hearing must proceed without delay.
4. WIC § 707 & 707.01: A mandatory fitness hearing is required to decide whether the juvenile should even face adult court prosecution.
These are not optional steps — they are jurisdictional requirements. If the juvenile court fails to comply, it loses the authority to decide the child’s fate, and any later prosecution in adult court is void.
---
The Violations: How Roy Lee Humphrey Was Denied His Rights
In Roy Lee Humphrey’s case, the Sacramento juvenile system violated every single one of these protections:
No petition was filed within the 48-hour window as required by WIC § 631.
No detention hearing was held under WIC § 632.
No jurisdictional hearing took place under WIC § 657.
No fitness hearing was ever conducted under WIC § 707 to determine if Roy should even be tried as an adult.
Worse still, Roy was never appointed counsel or advised of his rights in juvenile court.
Despite these glaring errors, Roy was transferred directly to adult criminal court, tried, convicted, and sentenced — all in blatant violation of his statutory and constitutional rights.
---
Why It Matters: A Void Conviction Under California Law
California courts have repeatedly held that these juvenile procedures are not minor technicalities — they go to the heart of the court’s power. In Juan G. v. Superior Court (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1480, the court made it clear:
> “A fitness hearing is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Without it, adult criminal prosecution is ultra vires — beyond the court’s power.”
Because Sacramento County failed to follow the mandatory juvenile procedures, the juvenile court never lawfully acquired jurisdiction over Roy Lee Humphrey. That means the adult court, by extension, also lacked jurisdiction. Under California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 473(d) and 43, the judgment against Roy is void on its face and must be set aside.
---
A Call for Justice
Roy Lee Humphrey’s case isn’t just a legal technicality — it’s a human tragedy and a stark example of how easily the system can steamroll the rights of vulnerable youth. Every safeguard ignored in his case was designed to protect minors from precisely this fate: being thrust into an adult system before anyone decides if that’s appropriate.
Justice demands that we correct these errors. At the very least, Roy is owed a process that follows the law — one that respects his rights as a minor and determines his future with the careful scrutiny the law requires.
---
Contact & Support:
📧 Roy Lee Humphrey, CDC# F26914
CSP-Solano
Email: RLHESTT84@gmail.com
---
Comments
Post a Comment