Exhibit A-7 (5/23/25) [SMS] Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
🔷 EXHIBIT A-7: May 23–24, 2025 — Arrest Warrant Issued Amid Jurisdictional Dispute; Defendant Declares Legal Autonomy, Patterson Invokes Psychiatric Allegation
.jpg "Exhibit A-7: Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.1 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.2 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.3 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.4 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.5 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.6 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.7 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.8 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
.png "Exhibit A-7.9 Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence")
---
1. Timeline Context
Following Patterson’s silent execution of an ex parte order for a second psychiatric evaluation (Exhibit A-5) and his subsequent refusal to answer jurisdictional questions (Exhibit A-6), this two-day exchange documents:
The court’s issuance of a bench warrant for failure to appear;
Patterson's attempt to coerce surrender under the false pretense of “mental illness”;
Defendant Taylor's explicit and consistent demand: produce the original court order for the D’Ingillo evaluation or the government loses jurisdiction;
Patterson’s attempted psychiatric reframe, ultimately culminating in his abrupt termination of communication.
---
2. Verbatim Transcript
Date: May 23–24, 2025
Exhibit ID: A-7
Participants:
Michael Taylor (Defendant)
Vernon Patterson (#163816, Deputy Public Defender)
---
5/23/25
Patterson:
The court issued a warrant for your arrest. Call me ASAP.
---
5/24/25
Michael Taylor:
Of course they did, bc u didn't challenge tha jurisdictional defect. I will not be giving you tha satisfaction of finishing this job for tha state and county. The Constitution is tha law of tha land, and this court has violated its own authority. I do not consent to prosecution in violation of my constitutional rights and state laws. And since my rights belong to me, I'm not giving tha court discretion to interpret. You did this to me, Mr. Patterson, because effective assistance of counsel is a constitutional right for all and you know that! Like I said before my bail was revoked, I beat this case already. And I'm gon TAKE my win if you don't give it to me. How yall lose to an indigent defendant!? I don't need a judge to dismiss a case that's already unconstitutional. I hereby dismiss this case. And tha United States can burn in hell for all I care at this point. Don't ever talk to me as if you ain't did nothing wrong.
---
Patterson:
You have a good case. Unfortunately, your mental illness has gotten in the way. It’s always better to fight the case from the outside. Now we will fight the case with you in custody. You can’t run from this. They will find you and put you in custody. And, because you failed to appear, the court will not let you out again until the case is finished. Your understanding of the legal process is flawed. Yes you do have constitutional rights and they have been protected. The law requires that you be competent to defend yourself. And you are not competent at this time. Take care of yourself.
---
Michael Taylor:
Lol I ain't going back n forth w you. Be thankful I'm a righteous man.
---
Patterson:
You put people’s lives in danger. The police will go to your friends' homes looking for you.
---
Michael Taylor:
Lol. How did I put people's lives in danger, Mr. Patterson?
---
Patterson:
Because the police will come to their door in the middle of the night. Ask Paul, he will tell you!
---
Michael Taylor:
Truth is, this court has put my life in danger by colluding w tha likes of you to deny me equal justice and systemically entrap me. So you agree, encounters with police is a danger?
---
Patterson:
Absolutely.
---
Michael Taylor:
I will not stand for injustice in my lifetime. I've walked 20 miles for the sole purpose of declaring victory in advance. 50 mile walks for determination. Perhaps you all underestimated me to think I would go to a friend's house at a time like this lol. That's why I call yall clowns 🤡. The prosecution’s case is centered around civil nature, and there are too many legal arguments I've been refused and denied to make for this case to have action. Cases have been dismissed for much less! I reject this idea that I have to pay for a lawyer to advocate or enforce my rights. Think about it. The only way tha court has action at this case is if you prejudice my defense. That's tha only way. And you all have absolutely done that by filing and relying on fabricated evidence. Bunch of idiots lol.
---
Patterson:
That’s not what I said. The police go there. I don’t think you will be there but the police will knock at 2 in the morning. Ask your friend. End of discussion.
---
Michael Taylor:
I don't account for checks and balances if it means me suffering prejudice. Therefore, any cop who pursues me is automatically implicated in this ongoing criminal conspiracy to commit fraud upon tha court. No case calls for fraud being committed in the course of a prosecution. Why would tha court deny me a fair evaluation if they didn't have to? Let's reason. Show me proof of that court order and I'll turn myself in today.
---
Patterson:
Stop texting me.
---
Michael Taylor:
You don't think I should turn myself in? You thought I was just gon let you dictate tha course of my defense despite me having legal agency and autonomy? U mad, bro? You thought I was going to accept violations of conflict-free representation? You conspired to deceive tha court if you can't show me that court order. You were gonna orally tell tha judge some bullshit that he was going to blindly accept under tha color of law. Why don't you just come out and admit you're a dumbass bro. I've missed more court dates in custody than this one time out of custody. Couple that with tha egregiousness of tha state violating its own laws makes this case problematic. I have filed for injunctive relief until tha state trial court can verify the court order for Dr. D'Ingillo's competency assessment. It is what must be done in tha interests of justice. This is a republic, and due process is foundational. Mr. Patterson, as soon as you can send me an authentic copy of the court order for Dr. D'Ingillo's competency assessment, I promise I will turn myself in immediately! Please help me help myself. Thanks.
---
3. Legal Analysis
🔸 Fraudulent Jurisdiction Reasserted Through Policing
Despite the ongoing, well-documented absence of a court order authorizing Dr. D’Ingillo’s competency assessment (Exhibits A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, & A-6), the State of California escalates the dispute into a custodial arrest, based not on clarified due process, but on forced compliance with a defective record.
This constitutes:
Retaliation for protected constitutional objections, in violation of BNL v. DOJ, Gomez v. Vernon, and McKaskle v. Wiggins.
Failure to correct a known jurisdictional defect, rendering any warrant procedurally suspect.
Constructive malicious prosecution where the State refuses to validate the predicate for its power.
🔸 Weaponized Mental Health Labeling
Patterson’s abrupt declaration:
> “You have a good case. Unfortunately, your mental illness has gotten in the way…”
is a textbook psychiatric silencing technique, used to:
Undermine credibility,
Reframe legal objections as symptomatic of disorder,
Justify further psychiatric evaluation (Rothberg),
Avoid confronting documented fraud upon the court.
This maneuver reveals bad faith, especially given Patterson’s prior refusals to answer direct legal questions.
---
4. Forensic Psychoanalysis
Vernon Patterson:
Escalates psychological warfare through fear (“police will knock in the middle of the night”),
Leverages psychiatry as a diagnostic rebuttal to Taylor’s arguments, rather than a therapeutic concern,
Silences discourse once he is logically cornered (“stop texting me”), a marker of guilt-based withdrawal.
Michael Taylor:
Engages in natural law reasoning by reaffirming the supremacy of due process over state discretion,
Consistently returns to a single rational demand: show the court order,
Demonstrates self-awareness, legal knowledge, and constitutional command that is incompatible with incompetency.
---
5. Public Interest Commentary
The most dangerous moment in any fraudulent prosecution is the moment the court refuses to justify its own authority, then punishes the defendant for calling it out.
This is what happens here.
Michael Taylor demands the court prove its power. Vernon Patterson, instead of complying, sends the police.
This is not just injustice. It is the criminalization of legal awareness. It’s retaliation cloaked in a warrant. It’s psychiatric repression weaponized through silence.
No matter what happens next, this record stands as a first-person declaration of unyielding legal resistance in the face of judicial fraud.
---
6. Credibility Links & Citations
📚 Legal Citations:
- Gomez v. Vernon (9th Cir. 2001) 255 F.3d 1118
- Pate v. Robinson (1966) 383 U.S. 375
- People v. Hale (1988) 44 Cal.3d 531
- Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 U.S. 668
- People v. Gonzalez (2003) 31 Cal.4th 745
- California Penal Code §§ 1368, 1370, 730
- California Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.1, 1.3, 2.1, 3.3
- 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (All Writs Act)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971) 403 U.S. 388
THE VERNON PATTERSON DOSSIER EXHIBIT INDEX:
EXHIBITS A: COMMUNICATIONS
- Exhibit A-1 (4/8/24) [SMS] Patterson Admits No Court Order for PC 730 Competency Assessment (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-2 (5/8/24) [SMS] Vernon Patterson Dismisses Due Process While Presuming Client's Guilt (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-3 (5/12/25) [SMS] Vernon Patterson Declares Unlawful State Hospital Commitment a “Non-Issue” (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-4 (5/13/25) [SMS] Vernon Patterson Denies Relevance of Missing Court Order While Scheduling New Competency Exam (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-5 (5/14/25) [COURT ORDER] Vernon Patterson Materializes Threat to Re-Evaluate Defendant Without Correcting Prior Fraud (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-6 (5/15/25) [SMS] Defendant Rejects Unlawful Psychiatric Evaluation; Patterson Refuses to Answer Jurisdictional Challenge (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-7 (5/23/25) [SMS] Judge Michael Carter Leverages Executive Authority Despite Lacking Jurisdiction; Patterson Weaponizes Silence (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-8 (5/28/25) [SMS] Defendant Demands Consent Waiver and Dismantles Cover-Up (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-9 (6/3/25) [EMAIL] Vernon Patterson’s Constructive Abandonment and Weaponized Incompetency Allegations (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
- Exhibit A-10 (6/23/25) [SMS] Vernon Patterson Folds! Withdraws Representation Without Due Process (The Vernon Patterson Dossier)
Comments
Post a Comment