Gavin Newsom Implicated in RICO Conspiracy to Cover-Up Judicial Fraud | Publicly Filed Confidential Medical Records of Mentally Ill Defendant
How a Sealed Court Order, a Fraudulent Assessment, and a Governor-Appointed Judge Orchestrated a Criminal Cover-Up in Plain View
PATTERSON REVEALS THE SEALED COURT ORDER AFTER ALREADY TELLING JUDGE IT DIDN'T EXIST RESULTING IN DENIAL OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DUE RELIEF AND AFTER BENCH WARRANT WAS ISSUED 👇👇👇
In a state supposedly championing progressive justice reform, the State of California has committed one of the most disturbing abuses of power in recent history — a textbook case of **government-sponsored fraud**, **constitutional sabotage**, and **racketeering under color of law**. What began as a routine criminal case devolved into a multi-year, multi-agency conspiracy — implicating judges, public defenders, state evaluators, and ultimately, **Governor Gavin Newsom** himself — in a concerted effort to falsify judicial proceedings, incarcerate a legally competent defendant, and obstruct exculpatory evidence. This is the story of how a sealed diversion order was transformed — illegally — into a **fraudulent competency proceeding**, weaponized against a defendant who refused to surrender his rights.
### **The Case Begins: From Charges to Pretrial Maneuvering**
The underlying case stems from charges filed on **November 18, 2021**, in Los Angeles County against the defendant, including **attempted murder**, and both **felony and misdemeanor hit-and-run** allegations. The case was assigned to **Pasadena Department F** under **Judge Suzette Louise Clover**, where pretrial proceedings began in early 2022.
Throughout 2022 and 2023, the public defenders worked to pursue **Mental Health Diversion** under **Penal Code § 1001.36**, which allows eligible defendants with mental disorders to undergo treatment in lieu of prosecution — provided a valid court order and expert evaluation support it. On **October 2, 2023**, such an order was issued: Judge Clover, citing good cause, appointed **Dr. Pietro D’Ingillo** under **Evidence Code §§ 730, 952**, and **PC § 1001.36** to perform a **confidential mental health diversion evaluation**, not a competency assessment. The order, notably, was **filed under seal** and required **confidentiality** of all generated reports.
That legal boundary — mental health diversion only — was the controlling authority on the scope of any psychiatric evaluation.
### **The Fraudulent Switch: From Diversion to Competency Without Judicial Order**
But by **February 14, 2024**, something had gone terribly wrong. On that date, public defender **Danielle Marie Daroca-Bell #265746** declared a **doubt to defendant’s competency**, citing an assessment authored by Dr. D’Ingillo — the same expert appointed for diversion. Yet the document, addressed to **Judge Clover**, was styled as a **Penal Code § 1368 competency report**, falsely claiming to be written “pursuant to the Minute Order dated 10/02/2023.”
This was a demonstrable lie.
The sealed order never authorized a competency evaluation. There was **no order from the court ever directing a PC 1368 exam**, and no hearing to determine whether proceedings should be suspended under due process requirements outlined in **People v. Ary (2011) 51 Cal.4th 510**. Nevertheless, based solely on this illegitimate report, **Judge Ronald Owen Kaye** — appointed by **Governor Gavin Newsom in 2020** — **tacitly accepted the suspension of criminal proceedings**, and jurisdiction under **Mental Health Court**, and **publicly filed** the previously confidential report. Judge Kaye compounded the constitutional breach by ordering further evaluations based on the faulty assessment, leading to the defendant’s **state commitment and forced medication**.
---
### **The Misdiagnosis, the Commitment, and the Silence**
The defendant, without opportunity to object to the record, was misdiagnosed with **unspecified schizophrenia**, forcibly medicated, and confined for nearly a year in the **California Department of State Hospitals**, despite no lawful basis for suspending criminal proceedings. All of this was predicated on a **re-purposed report** authored by a doctor who was **never authorized to conduct a competency evaluation** in the first place.
Every step of the process was a violation:
* The initial evaluation was confidential under a sealed order.
* The report was altered in scope and submitted to the wrong court.
* No judicial order existed authorizing a PC 1368 competency exam.
* The defendant was never given an adversarial hearing to object.
* The jurisdictional transfer itself was invalid.
Worse yet, the **sealed court order — the only document capable of disproving the legitimacy of the competency process — was withheld** from the defendant by his own attorneys, multiple judges, and court clerks for over a year.
### **The Defendant Fights Back — and Is Punished**
By **early 2025**, following forced restoration proceedings, the defendant began objecting vigorously. He demanded a copy of the original court order to challenge the lawfulness of the assessments and his detainment. His bail — originally granted on **April 20, 2022** — was **revoked on May 23, 2024**, solely for refusing to validate an invalid legal record. The court labeled him “noncompliant,” not because he violated any law, but because he **refused to submit to proceedings derived from fraud**.
The very next year, on 5/23/25, the defendant offered to surrender **on the condition the court produce the legal basis for the competency proceedings**. Neither the judge nor the public defender could comply.
Instead, on **May 28, 2025**, **bar panel attorney Vernon Patterson quietly emailed the sealed October 2, 2023, order** to the defendant. His cover email read:
> "Here is the document you requested. And notice that it was filed under seal."
This was the smoking gun.
It confirmed the defendant’s claim: **the court had never authorized a competency evaluation.** The legal foundation for the entire suspension of criminal proceedings was fraudulent — knowingly so — and all subsequent orders, including commitment, medication, and forced restoration, were **void ab initio**.
### **RICO Conspiracy and the Indisputable Implication of Governor Gavin Newsom**
The elements of a **Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violation** under **18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968** are firmly met:
* **Predicate acts**: fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and conspiracy against rights (18 U.S.C. § 241).
* **Pattern**: Coordinated concealment and falsification of legal documents, judicial rulings, and mental health records.
* **Enterprise**: State and county actors including judges, defense attorneys, court evaluators, state hospital administrators, and public offices.
* **Injured party**: The defendant — detained, forcibly medicated, and deprived of due process.
* **Foreseeable risk**: The actors knew, or had reason to know, they were violating binding constitutional standards.
And now, the legal line leads directly to the **Governor of California**:
* **Governor Gavin Newsom appointed Judge Ronald Kaye**, who unlawfully accepted a jurisdictional transfer based on fraudulent evidence.
* His office is **statutorily and constitutionally responsible** for the administration of state mental health institutions and judicial oversight.
* Despite multiple avenues for redress, the Governor and his administration **failed to investigate**, **ignored public outcry**, and **did nothing to correct the record** — a clear ratification of unlawful acts.
* Under **Monell v. Dept. of Social Services (436 U.S. 658)** and subsequent rulings, inaction by a government policymaker **with deliberate indifference** constitutes **state endorsement** of civil rights violations.
Thus, **Governor Newsom is not merely politically responsible — he is legally liable** under **RICO § 1962(d)** as a conspirator and enabling policy actor. The protections of judicial, executive, and qualified immunity do **not apply** when:
* Officers act **in the clear absence of all jurisdiction** (Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349).
* State actors conspire to commit fraud (Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24).
* Conduct includes **knowingly violating clearly established constitutional rights** (Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800).
* There is **no discretion** to violate the Constitution (Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622).
This was not a policy mistake.
This was not a misunderstanding.
This was a **criminal conspiracy** — **deliberate, coordinated, and concealed** — at every level of state power.
---
### **Conclusion: The Defendant Was Right — The Record Was Fraudulent**
It should never have taken years, a sealed order, and forced state hospitalization for the truth to come to light. But now it has. The sealed order proves the evaluation was unlawful. The court’s silence proves the concealment was intentional. The timeline proves the conspiracy was real. And the Governor’s indifference confirms the state’s endorsement of criminal activity.
The immunity veil has lifted.
**The facts are in. The cover-up is proven. The conspiracy is complete. And Governor Gavin Newsom is legally, constitutionally, and criminally implicated under RICO.**
VERNON PATTERSON SUPPRESSED EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE REVEALING THE COURT ORDER'S AUTHORIZED SCOPE THAT WAS EXCEEDED BY DR. D'INGILLO.
PATTERSON’S STATEMENTS AFFIRM VIOLATIONS OF CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT AND/OR SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PSYCHIATRIST & PSYCHOLOGIST PANEL BY CLAIMING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE PACE FORM BUT NOT THE ACCOMPANYING COURT ORDER AS REQUIRED BY LAW
4. APPOINTMENT OF PANEL MEMBERS
c.The panel member should receive a copy of the signed order and appointing minute order before commencing any work on the case.
7. COMPENSATION OF PANEL MEMBERS
a. To be compensated for their services, Panel members must be appointed by the court prior to the date the Panel member renders services on a case. Panel members are responsible for verifying that the court has made such an order before performing services for which they seek compensation.
PATTERSON ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE AND THE COURT AFFIRMED NO COURT ORDER FOR THE COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT WAS NECESSARY 👇👇👇
HERE, PATTERSON IS IMPLYING THAT THE JUDGE HAS RIGHT AND/OR AUTHORITY TO PERMIT DEFENSE COUNSEL WITH WAIVING DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE WITHOUT INFORMED OR EXPRESSED CONSENT. BECAUSE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON THE WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE, THE CRIMINAL CASE COLLAPSES ON PUBLIC DEFENDERS IF THEY ARE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVE CONSENT WAS VOLUNTARILY WAIVED BY THE DEFENDANT 👇👇👇
HERE, PATTERSON IS PRIORITIZING PROCEDURE OVER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE IN DEFENSE OF THE COURT THAT VIOLATED ITS OWN COURT ORDER AT THE DEFENDANT’S EXPENSE BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT’S PRESENCE WAS NEVER REQUIRED FOR THE COURT TO ACT UPON ITS OWN MOTION TO CORRECT ITS OWN RECORD. PATTERSON IS IMPLYING THAT THE DEFENDANT SHOULD FIRST TURN HIMSELF IN SO THAT THE COURT REGAINS PROCEDURAL LEVERAGE OVER HIM TO COMPLETE THEIR COVER-UP 👇👇👇
IF RICARDO GARCIA OR SERGIO TAPIA CANNOT PRODUCE THE CONSENT WAIVER FOR THE BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY, THE CASE COLLAPSES ENTIRELY, AND GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM IS INDEED IMPLICATED IN THE CONSPIRACY TO PREDETERMINE THE NEGLECT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF INDIGENT DEFENDANTS.
Comments
Post a Comment