By Michael Taylor | ThaWilsonBlock Magazine The question of who qualifies for American citizenship is not just a moral or political debate — it is a constitutional one. For over a century, courts and executive agencies have applied birthright citizenship in a way that defies the intent of the 14th Amendment and undermines Congress’s constitutional authority. This practice, particularly as it applies to children born to undocumented immigrants, raises a serious challenge: > Can individuals derive irrevocable constitutional benefits from ongoing unlawful presence? And if not, why has the judiciary allowed it? This question strikes at the heart of the rule of law. The answer lies in decades of misinterpretation, judicial drift, and administrative neglect. The issue is not emotional. It is structural. And it belongs squarely with Congress, not the courts or the White House. --- 🔎 The 14th Amendment’s Soft Spot: Jurisdiction The 14th Amendment states: > “All persons born ...
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Edinburgh-born indie-rock musician LEAP aka Jacky Balfour Scott delivers addictive rock track “Energies,” exploring his own mental health issues within frenetic soundscape founded on heavy beats, enticing riffs and raw lyricism. Taking us deep inside his psyche, the song delves into the moments when exhilaration veers into loss of control, inspired by his own experience with being […]
Comments
Post a Comment